Historians
have always had a running debate about whether individual people affect
history or historical trends and events essentially "create" the leaders
needed at a particular time and place. Biographers emphasize the influence
of "great" men and women in changing the course of world events. Social
historians tend to view people as pawns of larger forces of change.
George Washington
fulfilled a unique role in American history. He was not only the commander
of the army that won the war but the figurehead and personal embodiment
of the cause. He was the first President. Everything that he did set
precedents.
He was a man of
his times, but he was unusual. He was as different from most of his
contemporaries as was his handwriting. Some special combination of family
influences and early experiences gave him a personality and disposition
uniquely suited to meeting the particular challenges thrust upon him
by the times and by his world.
He is not considered
to be a great thinker, but his thought processes, captured in the etiquette
and processes of how our military and government operates, left a more
permanent imprint on the country than those of his intellectual peers.
He is not considered a brilliant military mind, but his victories have
had far greater long-term impact on world history than those of Frederick
the Great or Napoleon.
It is very easy
to undervalue the man or take him for granted. Perhaps that, in itself,
pinpoints the nature of his legacy--the incorruptible, "inner-directed
man", the role model and essence of a character-type that remains peculiarly
American, elusive to others, and very much alive in this country today.