| Educational Institutions in the North Educational Institutions in the South Coeducational Institutions | ![]() |
| Women's Education Home Page |
Colonial Heritage | Female Curriculum | Student Life | Teaching | Religion, Race, Culture | Academies & Seminaries | Clements Library Home Page |
| Inventory of Exhibit Sources | |||||||
Educational Institutions in the North |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Monticello Female Seminary Flyer | ||||
Letters in this collection illustrate the gradual transition from private education and boarding schools to female seminaries. By the mid-nineteenth century, female seminaries and academies were everywhere, replacing the homelike atmosphere of boarding schools with a more institutional setting. Large, classical edifices that housed dormitory rooms, chapels, dining halls, and classrooms with desks aligned in rows became standard. Schools standardized the curriculum and awarded diplomas and degrees. The nineteenth century was a period of transition characterized both by private teachers who opened schools in rented houses and hired other women to assist with the work of boarding and teaching, and by seasoned educators who found benefactors to build school buildings capable of holding one to two hundred students. According to a letter dated Troy, June 24, 1821, in the Cole Family Papers, Troy Female Seminary opened in two adjoining houses, but by 1850, Troy benefactors had built a large classical edifice. Diantha Gray Sackett taught what she called the Wadawannuck Female Seminary in a house in Stonington, Massachussetts. She moved in 1854 to LeRoy, New York, where she opened Ingham Collegiate Institute, and later had a role in founding Almira College.1 Teachers like Emma Willard and Catharine Beecher pleaded for endowed female seminaries, corresponding to men's colleges. In Willard's 1819 Plan for Female Education, she argued that female higher education was too dependent on the whims of fashion and student fancies. An endowment would provide a measure of intellectual independence to women's seminaries. This independence would allow for higher academic standards, encourage teachers to strive for excellence, and provide for institutional continuity. The New York legislature never endowed Willard's seminary, but she had framed the arguments that inspired ever larger female seminaries.2 Catharine Beecher presented her own arguments for women's higher education. Her arguments emphasized woman's unique duties and responsiblities--women's duties as mother, her special talents with the very young, women's moralizing influence on society, and women's role as missionaries to other women. She emphasized all these "special" female attributes as she argued for endowments for women's educational institutions.3 In the cultural environment of the day, these arguments were compelling. Benjamin Godfrey single-handedly endowed Monticello Seminary near St. Louis, in western Illinois. Godfrey was impressed with a mother's influence on a child's early development and he built a seminary to educate the daughters of farmers and shopkeepers. His intent was to provide an education for students who would otherwise have almost no opportunity for an education.4 In other cases, such as Putnam Female Seminary in Zanesville, Ohio, benefactors endowed what they intended as an institution of high quality. The grandmother of one of Catharine Beecher's students endowed Putnam to replicate Beecher's system of education in Ohio.5 Mary Lyon, on the other hand, envisioned an affordable female seminary that worked like a clock. Mt. Holyoke Female Seminary required every student to contribute to the labors of the kitchen, laundry, and housekeeping. (These tasks had otherwise fallen to servants or poor students who worked to pay for their board). Lyons tried to find wealthy philanthropists to fund her idea, but failing this, she raised the necessary funds from thousands of devout women in rural New England. These women believed in the value of labor, hard study and religious purpose. Lyon systematized female education at Mt. Holyoke Female Seminary--bells rang to signal the change of classes, work hours, meals, study, and chapel. It's success won high praise for the Mt. Holyoke system and several "daughter" colleges were opened, mostly in Ohio.6 | ||||
Selected Letters About Educational Institutions in the North | ||||
![]() Letter from Troy Female Seminary, June 24, 1821 Cole Family Papers |
"The Sem has been very much improved. . .the building has been made higher and longer. . ." |
![]() Letter from Troy Female Seminary, Oct. 4, 1833 Cole Family Papers | ||
![]() Letter to Mt. Holyoke Female Seminary student, March 2, 1853, pg. 1 Talcott Family Papers |
"And you were not appalled by a practical introduction to the Domestic Department! That ungenteel, unmentionable place of servitude!" |
![]() Letter to Mt. Holyoke Female Seminary student, March 2, 1853, pg. 3 Talcott Family Papers | ||
![]() Letter from Wadawannuck Female Seminary, undated, pg. 1 Kendall-Brown Family Papers |
"The chief building. . .consist of forty [student] rooms. . .school rooms. . .kitchen, dining room and chapel." |
![]() Monticello Female Seminary Flyer, 1845 Norton Strange Townsend Papers | ||
| Return to Top | ||||
| ||||
Educational Institutions in the South |
||||
![]() |
Southern society included wealthy planters distributed widely across primarily rural landscapes. Female seminaries in the South educated these daughters. An education in a renowned and fashionable seminary conferred social capital as well as intellectual and artistic satisfaction. Southern female seminaries were among the most advanced in the country, offering four-year college-level curriculums before the Civil War. In part, this reflected the fact that planters could afford to send their daughters for a four-year degree and that slavery enabled mothers to do without their daughter's labor. Typically, students also incurred considerable expense in buying fashionable clothing and jewelry, and slaves sometimes accompanied them to the boarding school. Teaching was not a popular profession for southern belles; as a result, there were more opportunities to teach in the South than teachers to fill them. Many northern teachers went South to find work, and Emma Willard sent many graduates South to teach.7 |
|||
Selected Letters About Southern Educational Institutions | ||||
![]() Julia Bolton Student Notebook, 1852-1855 |
"Your friend Lizzie, Harris Cty, Georgia" |
![]() Julia Bolton Student Notebook, 1852-1855 |
||
![]() Letter to Betty Crowder, Sept. 23rd, pg. 2 American Education Collection, Betty Crowder |
"An Address Delivered on the Second Anniversary of Van Doren's Collegiate Institute for Young Ladies, in the City of Lexington, Kentucky, July, 1833, by Charles S. Morehead" |
![]() Van Doren's Collegiate Institute for Young Ladies, July 1833 Published pamphlet |
||
| Return to Top | ||||
| ||||
Coeducational Institutions |
||||
![]() Clermont Academy Broadside, 1836 Before the 1850s, coeducation was controversial in the North and never adopted in the South. Oberlin College was the first coeducational college in the United States, opening in 1833. Before becoming a college, Oberlin was a typical, coeducational seminary and like most rural academies admitted women to female departments within the academy. Oberlin made a radical step when it transformed itself into a college and its trustees voted to admit women to the college courses for college degrees. Oberlin trustees believed that education encouraged salvation and prepared a student to become a missionary or teacher. Since they believed this, Oberlin officials felt they could not deny women what amounted to a chance at eternal salvation. Oberlin women rose to the challenge, becoming devout and dedicated students, community members, and evangelicals.8 Oberlin's "experiment" shocked men's colleges, but set a pattern for other co-educational seminaries. Methodists and other minor denominations with strong roots in rural areas took an entirely different view of coeducation. First, rural academies across the North were traditionally coeducational. In addition, rural-based denominations had relatively few wealthy members, they had to raise funds to build colleges from among the farmers and shopkeepers who belonged to their churches. To appeal to these donors--most of whom did not aspire to be lawyers or ministers--they argued that their colleges would do more than train ministers or social elites. These coeducational seminaries were to teach all students a practical education in sciences, writing, mathematics, and business. They also argued that they would offer women equal educational opportunities--preparing rural women to teach. Methodists and Baptists had opened a few men's colleges in the 1830s, but by the 1850s, Methodists in particular, had opened dozens of coeducational colleges; by the 1870s, they also opened their previously all-male colleges to women.9 |
||||
Selected Letters About Coeducational Institutions | ||||
![]() Clermont Broadside Wilson Family Papers |
Ma wants to be with brother and I while we remain at School. |
![]() Letter from Genesee Seminary, dated Thurs. AM Harriet J. Kendall Papers |
||
![]() Letter from Ohio Wesleyan University, Nov. 8, 1885, pg. 4 Reed-Blackmer Family Papers |
"We have to eat at tables with all the boys" |
![]() Letter from Canandaigua Seminary, Nov. 21, 1852, pg. 3 Reed-Blackmer Family Papers |
||
| Return to Top | ||||
| Reading Between the Lines | ||||
Find evidence of students shaping institutions and institutions shaping students. Play devil's advocate and list reasons that one was more important than the other. What role did all-female seminaries play in shaping/advancing women's higher education? What role did coeducational institutions play? Is there any evidence in these letters that coeducational institutions had more difficulties managing students than female seminaries? What resources were required to establish a school versus an incorporated seminary? List those resources that were available to white women, cash-poor women, African-American women, etc.? Imagine the horizon of possibilities for various groups of women. |
||||
| Return to Top | ||||
| Related Primary Source Materials at the Clements Library | ||||
| Dana, Daniel | Hints on reading. . .Ipswich female seminary 1834 | |||
| Emerson, Joseph | Female education. . .Saugus seminary hall 1822 | |||
| Sage, Mrs. Russell | Emma Willard and her pupils 1898 | |||
| Garnett, James Mercer | Lectures on female education. . .Mrs. Garnett's [Virginia] 1825 | |||
| Garnett, James Mercer | Lectures on various topicks. . .Mrs. Garnett's [Virginia] 1827 | |||
| Garnett, James Mercer | Seven lectures on female education. . .Mrs. Garnett's [Virginia] 1824 | |||
| [Harris] | Harris' Pittsburgh business directory 1837 | |||
| Newark [N.J.] Academy | Young ladies' department 1814 | |||
| Rankin, Edward | Design of woman's education. . .Raymond Institute [Carmel, N.Y.] 1859 | |||
| -------- | Record of the first reunion of the graduates of St. Mary's Hall 1875 | |||
| Russell, William | Education of females. . .Abbot female academy, Andover, Mass. 1843 | |||
| Bradford Academy | Semi-centennial catalogue of the officers and students of Bradford Academy, [Cambridge, Mass.] 1853 | |||
| Stanton, Robert Livingston | Female heroism . . .Oxford female college [Ohio] 1857 | |||
| Van Rensselaer, Cortlant | Female education. . .Blairsville female seminary [Penn.] 1841 | |||
| Willard, Emma | Address to the public, particularly to the members of the Legislature of New-York, proposing a plan for improving female education 1819 | |||
| Alabama Female Institute | Catalogue of the Alabama Female Institute [Tuscaloosa] 1836 & 1837 | |||
| Chandler, Daniel | Address on female education. . .University of Georgia 1835 | |||
| Oakland Female Institute | Circular and catalogue of the Oakland Female Institute, [Norristown, Penn.] 1849 | |||
| Emerson, Joseph | Prospectus of the female seminary at Wethersfield, Ct. 1826 | |||
| Fory, M.R. | Address. . .Mrs. DuPre's Female Seminary [Charleston, S.C.] 1847 | |||
| Harris, Samuel | Complete academic education of females. . . Young Ladies' Institute, [Pittsfield, Mass.] 1853 | |||
| Hawes, Joel | Looking glass for ladies. . .Mt. Holyoke Female Seminary [Hadley, Mass.] 1845 | |||
| Irving, John Treat | Address. . .New-York high-school for females 1826 | |||
| LeConte. | Address. . .Laurensville Female College [Laurensville, S.C.] 1860 | |||
| Ludlow, John | Address. . .Female Academy in Albany 1834 | |||
| McCabe, John Collins | Address. . .Hampton Academy [Richmond, Virg.] 1853 | |||
| Magill, Edward Hicks | Address upon the co-education of the sexes 1873 | |||
| Pierce, Henry Miller | Address. . .Rutgers Female College [N.Y.C.] 1868 | |||
| Patapsco Female Institute | Seventeenth annual report of the Patapsco Female Institute [Ellicott City, Md.] 1858 | |||
| Tefft, Benjamin Franklin | Inaugural address. . .Genesee College [Lima, N.Y.] 1851 | |||
| -------- | Select day and boarding school for young ladies [Baltimore, Maryland] 1840 | |||
| Rutgers Female Institute | Rutgers Female Institute [N.Y.C.] Annual circular | |||
| Return to Top | ||||
| Secondary Sources for Student Life | ||||
1Kerns, Kathryn. "Antebellum Higher Education for Women in Western New York State." Ph.D. diss., University Pennsylvannia, 1993. Kerns describes Ingham Collegiate Institute. | ||||
2Emma Willard, An address to the public; particularly to the members of the Legislature of New-York, proposing a plan for improving female education. Middlebury [Vt.] J.W. Copeland. 1819. | ||||
3Catharine Beecher. An Essay on the Education of Female Teachers: written at the request of the American Lyceum and communicated at their annual meeting, New York, May 8th, 1835. New York: Van Nostrand and Dwight, 1835. | ||||
4Young, Homer Floyd. "Origin and Early History of Monticello Female Seminary, 1834-1865." Ph.D. diss., Washington University, 1951. | ||||
5"School Diary." Putnam Female Seminary. McIntire Library, Zanesville, Ohio. | ||||
6Sklar, Kathryn Kish. "The Founding of Mount Holyoke College," in Women of America: A History, ed. Carol Ruth Berkin and Mary Beth Norton. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1979.7For excellent background on Southern education, see Christine Farnham. The Education of the Southern Belle: Higher Education and Student Socialization in the Antebellum South. New York: New York University Press, 1994. | ||||
8Fletcher, Robert S. A History of Oberlin College From Its Foundation Through the Civil War. 2 Vols. Oberlin, OH: Oberlin College, 1843. | ||||
9Malkmus, "Capable Women and Refined Ladies: Two Visions of American Women's Higher Education, 1790-1861." Ph.D. Diss., University of Iowa, 2001, 144-156. | ||||
| Return to Top | ||||